Connect with us

Action Alerts

ACTION ALERT: Oppose Steve Bannon’s Role on the National Security Council

Alex Mohajer

Published

on

Bros4America is a proud member of the Indivisible Network. They have provided us with this useful information on how to best oppose Steve Bannon’s role on the National Security Council.

In January, Donald Trump signed a presidential memorandum giving the white nationalist and political operator Steve Bannon a full seat on the “principals committee” of the National Security Council.  At the same time, Trump removed the Director of National Intelligence and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) as regular attendees.

This unprecedented move to permanently put a right-wing political agitator with minimal national security experience in the Situation Room, while excluding high-ranking intelligence and military officials, raises serious questions about the integrity of the National Security Council’s decision-making and places all of us at risk.

Legislation introduced in the Senate (S. 291) and the House (H.R. 804) would ensure that political operators like Steve Bannon are excluded from the National Security Council and that national security experts are the ones making life-and-death decisions about our national security.

Call your Senators/Representative today and tell them to cosponsor legislation to keep Steve Bannon out of the Situation Room and ensure that national security decisions are not influenced by political considerations.

SAMPLE CALL DIALOGUE

Caller: Good morning/afternoon! I’m a constituent and I’m calling to ask what Senator/Representative Bob’s position is on Trump’s changes to the National Security Council?

  • Option 1: OPPOSES TRUMP’S ACTION ELEVATING STEVE BANNON TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL

    Staffer: Thank you for calling! Senator/Representative Bob opposes Steve Bannon’s elevation to the National Security Council.

    Caller: That’s great! I’m calling to say that if Senator/Representative Bob truly believes, as I do, that Steve Bannon does not belong on the National Security Council, then he should take steps to make it law.  Will he/she commit to cosponsoring S. 291/H.R. 804 to clarify the permanent membership of the National Security Council to better ensure that national security decisions are not clouded by political calculations?

  • Option 2: SUPPORTS TRUMP’S ACTION ELEVATING STEVE BANNON TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL

    Staffer: Thank you for calling! Senator/Representative Bob supports the President’s move to reorganize the permanent membership of the National Security Council.

    Caller: That’s terrible. What that means is Senator/Representative Bob is choosing politics over national security.  It means that Steve Bannon, rather than the Director of National Intelligence and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will be making life-and-death decisions for millions of service members and intelligence agents around the world.  Does the Senator/Representative really believe that Steve Bannon should be helping make our most consequential national security decisions over the next four years?

    Staffer: As commander in chief, President Trump is entitled to choose his advisors.  Other presidents have included political strategists in national security meetings.  The order says the Director of National Intelligence and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff can continue to attend meetings that involve issues pertaining to their responsibilities and expertise.

    Caller: That’s wrong. Bannon’s role is to ask what is best for the president’s political interests rather than what is best for our nation’s security. Neither President Obama nor President Bush gave a permanent seat to their chief strategists. What does Steve Bannon have to contribute to discussions about national security?

  • Option 3: DODGES / HAS NO POSITION

    Staffer: Thank you for calling! I have no idea what the Senator/Representative’s position is on the changes to the National Security Council, but I’m happy to take down your concerns.

    Caller: That’s disappointing to hear–this is an important issue for millions of Americans, myself included. Steve Bannon has no expertise to contribute to discussions about national security and he should not have a role on the National Security Council. His role is to ask what is best for the president’s political interests rather than what is best for our nation’s security. Does the Senator/Representative really have no position on whether Steve Bannon should be helping make our most consequential national security decisions over the next four years?

    Staffer: I don’t know, but I’m happy to take down your concerns.

    Caller: Here’s my concern: It’s dangerous to exclude the top intelligence and military officials from the most consequential decisions affecting national security and even more dangerous to insert a political operator such as Bannon into the process. I expect Senator/Representative Bob to represent and help protect his constituents like me when decisions are being made about our nation’s security rather than Trump’s political interests. I expect Senator/Representative Bob to do two things to prove that he is on my side:

    1. Publicly oppose Bannon having permanent membership in the NSC’s “principals committee.”

    2. Co-sponsor S. 291/H.R. 804 to clarify the permanent membership of the National Security Council to better ensure that national security decisions are not clouded by political calculations.

    Will Senator/Representative Bob commit to cosponsoring S. 291/H.R. 804 to protect his constituents?

    Staffer: I will certainly pass on your concerns to the Senator/Representative.

    Caller: Please do, and please take down my contact information to let me know when the Senator/Representative has made up his/her mind. I’m eager to hear what he/she decides

Named one of OUT Magazine's 100 Most Eligible Bachelors of 2017, Alex Mohajer is a controversial up-and-coming political writer and commentator whose unapologetic post-election commentary made him one of the most shared contributors at The Huffington Post. He is the first journalist in America to openly impugn the presidency of Donald Trump in a major publication. Mohajer is the Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Bros4America (formerly Bros4Hillary), a progressive advocacy organization that gained national recognition during the 2016 presidential election for its efforts to elect Hillary Clinton. Named by LGBTQ Nation to their Top 8 People Working to Elect Hillary Clinton. Alex holds a Bachelor of Arts from U.C. Berkeley where he studied politics with progressive champion Robert Reich, and a Juris Doctorate from Chapman University School of Law, where he studied constitutional law with conservative hero Hugh Hewitt. While in law school, he was awarded "Most Likely To Be Held in Contempt" by his graduating class. He has been interviewed for or featured on The Fox News Channel, PolitiFact, The Huffington Post, Washington Post, LA and NY Times, AfterBuzz TV, OUT and Instinct Magazine(s), Dan Savage Blog, TheWrap, Yahoo News, New York Public Radio, The David Pakman Show, The Ann Walker Show, the Hugh Hewitt Show, and more. Alex is an author, public/motivational speaker, and an award-winning singer, actor, and solo artist who was nominated for a 2016 Broadway World Award for Best Male Cabaret Artist. Alex lives in Los Angeles with his dog, Bruce Wayne. Press inquiries and bookings: press@bros4america.com

Advertisement
(function() { var zergnet = document.createElement('script'); zergnet.type = 'text/javascript'; zergnet.async = true; zergnet.src = (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https:" : "http:") + '//www.zergnet.com/zerg.js?id=66986'; var znscr = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; znscr.parentNode.insertBefore(zergnet, znscr); })();
Comments